ムラヤマ ノリオ
Murayama Norio
村山 憲男 所属
人間社会学部 心理学科
生活機構研究科 心理学専攻
生活心理研究所 所属教員
職種
准教授
|
|
言語種別 | 英語 |
発行・発表の年月 | 2022/07 |
形態種別 | 学術雑誌 |
査読 | 査読あり |
標題 | Preferences of patients with cancer for psychological counseling: a cross-sectional study using full-profile conjoint analysis in Japan |
執筆形態 | 共著 |
掲載誌名 | Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and Practice |
掲載区分 | 国外 |
巻・号・頁 | 4(3) |
著者・共著者 | Kanako ICHIKURA, Sayuri SHIMIZU, Noriko OSHIMA, Yosuke ARIIZUMI, Toshihide FUJIE, Shinichi YAMAUCHI, Toshiaki ISHIKAWA, Yasuaki NAKAJIMA, Yuko FUKASE, Norio MURAYAMA, Hanako MURASE, Hirokuni TAGAYA, Takashi TAKEUCHI, Satoshi MIYAKE, Eisuke MATSUSHIMA |
概要 | Background: Psychological counselling is an effective non-pharmacological intervention for cancer patients facing psychological distress. However, there are barriers to applying counselling in clinical settings because some cancer patients feel that it is a burden and subsequently drop out. This study assessed cancer patients' preferences for psychological counselling using a conjoint analysis approach. Methods: We conducted a single-center, cross-sectional study using a self-reported questionnaire. The data were collected from outpatients and inpatients at the departments of Respiratory Medicine, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Female Pelvic Surgery, and Head and Neck Surgery from a university hospital between March 2018 and March 2020. The questionnaire, developed from an interview with a clinical psychologist, asked for patients' preferences for counselling with 48 scenarios according to a combination of type, length, price, and frequency. We conducted a conjoint analysis, calculating the relative importance and part-worth value of each factor. Results: According to the conjoint analysis modeling, cancer patients consider the type as the most important factor when deciding whether to undergo counselling (relative importance: 37.5%), followed by frequency (23.4%), price (19.6%), and length (19.5%). Cancer patients value life reviews highly among the four counselling types. However, women and younger patients valued counselling for emotional control the highest, with advanced cancer patients valuing counselling for problem solving the most. Conclusions: The results reveal that cancer patients consider the type and content of counselling to be the most important factors in the selection process, although preferences depend on individual characteristics. This is the first study to clarify cancer patients' preferences for psychological counselling using conjoint analysis and proposes a new economical method in the psycho-oncology field. |